Adani coal project in Australia runs into controversy

Adani coal project in Australia runs into controversyMELBOURNE: India’s mining giant Adani Group’s 16.5 billion dollar coal mine project in Australia’s Queensland has run into another controversy after reports that senior bureaucrats were sidelined over key decisions on the deal for the venture which was red-flagged by many officials.

Documents obtained by the ABC News under the Right to Information laws showed that the Queensland Treasury and the Department of Premier and Cabinet were frozen out of key government decisions about the controversial Carmichael mine project.

Senior Treasury bureaucrats were even “uninvited” from a high-level meeting involving the company and the Department of State Development, the ABC report said.

The documents outlining negotiations also show “the confusion and suspicion among high-ranking Queensland bureaucrats about the decision-making process,” it said.

The report cited the then head of Treasury’s warning, saying, “I would prefer to keep at arm’s length at present, and not get trapped into a set-up”.

The documents showed the set-up he feared was not from Adani, but from the Department of State Development under then deputy premier Jeff Seeney, whose department was driving the negotiations with the Indian mining giant.

“Those talks led to draft agreements that were signed without consultation with the Department of Premier and Cabinet or with Treasury,” the report said.

It said that in one email, a Treasury official complained about how the Department of State Development was handling the drafting of a paper about rail and infrastructure options for the Galilee Basin, saying a colleague in State Development “was most reluctant to give me any detail or the actual paper”.

In November 2014, the Department of State Development signed a series of agreements with Adani, including an infrastructure investment agreement and a statement of intent which was news to then Treasury head Mark Gray.

Gray emailed seeking details from his counterpart in Department of State Development, David Edwards, stating, “Hi David, I understand from the Treasurer that some document or agreement was signed on Wednesday with Adani. Would you please be able to send through a copy for our information?”

Earlier on Wednesday, the Sydney Morning Herald also claimed that Treasury officials had warned the former state government that the project was inviable.

Adani spokesperson declined to comment on the latest reports but quoted the Treasurer’s office as saying that the views raised in the RTI documents relate to the former Liberal National Party government’s interactions with Adani.

“They do not reflect the views of the current government or Queensland Treasury. Former Under Treasurer Mark Gray is no longer with Queensland Treasury,” the Treasurer’s office was quoted as saying by the Adani group.

“We welcome Adani’s significant investment proposal in Queensland with the Carmichael Coal Project and enabling infrastructure. The (Annastacia) Palaszczuk Government expects Adani to meet all of its obligations in relation to all relevant State and Commonwealth legislation,” the Treasury Office statement said.

“We will meet all our election commitments on this project, both in terms of the dredging project at Abbot Point and not making direct government contributions towards funding the railway,” it said.

“The Palaszczuk Government is committed to creating jobs throughout Queensland and we support the sustainable development of the Galilee Basin,” it added.

Hundreds of pages of correspondence between senior figures in the Queensland department, including former under treasurer Gray and principal commercial analyst Jason Wishart, expresses fears about Adani’s high level of debt and identify the mining giant as a ‘risk’ because of its unclear corporate structure and use of offshore entities, the Sydney Morning Herald said in its report.

“In one document, an email from November last year, days before an announcement that the Newman government would help Adani build its rail, Projects Queensland principal commercial analyst Jason Wishart wrote to David Quinn, the executive director of Projects Queensland: ‘It is unlikely to stack up on a conventional project finance assessment’,” the report said.

It also referred to trail of emails between September and December which saw a rising level of urgency in Treasury as officials tried to conduct a proper financial assessment of Adani while the Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning (DIIP), led by Seeney pushed ahead with a proposal to assist the company.

The report said that Wishart had said the expansion would put Adani’s financial position under “increased strain” and according to another Treasury briefing note “the group was highly susceptible to cost shocks”.

In October, Wishart wrote in another email to then Under Treasurer Gray, “That level of funding interest has been declining with the slide in the coal price over the last two years.”

The Treasury documents also noted that Adani had taken terminal one at Abbot Point, which it leases from the Queensland government “off the books”.

Reacting to the latest controversy, the Greens deputy leader Larissa Waters criticized the former Newman Government for going against state treasury by trying to prop up Adani.

Right to information documents show Treasury warned Adani’s Glilee Basin project was “unlikely to stack up” financially and that Adani was “susceptible to cost shocks” and “not particularly transparent”, the report said.–PTI